Member Statements on Resolution 2025-06-GR01: For Steering Committee Experience with Conduct Violations and Grievances

IN FAVOR by Stephen W

My name is Stephen Walkiewicz and I am a member of the DC Abolition working group. I believe the general body should pass the resolution for Steering Committee Experience with Conduct Violations and Grievances. As someone who has written and implemented safety polices for jobs, this resolution is crucial to ensure our safety. Accidents cannot be predicted, but they can be mitigated. By placing people in leadership positions but not giving them the appropriate tools and skills to deescalate, a minor incident can quickly become a major issue. This resolution will help ensure we have a baseline standard to ensure that anyone who steps up into a leadership position is successful in ensuring the safety of everyone in the group. As we continue to grow, and more view points are brought in, it is imperative that we have a consistent guide line on how to deal with conflicts. We want to assume the best of everyone, but not having these skills and policies for leaders will lead to mistakes and issues that the organization will have to spend valuable time and resources that are too critical to spare. It is these preventative measures that make DSA successful and enact sustainable change.

IN FAVOR by Guido V

I’m writing this statement in STRONG support for Resolution 2025-06-GR01: For Steering Committee Experience with Conduct Violations and Grievances. If we’re to be the leaders in bringing about a socialist future, which I believe we are, then we must put consent based, victim centered policy to the forefront in our harassment/grievance process. These principles MUST be present in every member from Steering down through rank-in-file. The education and training that this resolution will provide is crucial for both beginning to heal the wounds of the past and laying the foundation for the future.

IN FAVOR by Julia P

Grievance processes of their nature deal with upsetting experiences of interpersonal misconduct and harm, and when adjudication is handled by a leadership body that lacks a clear and comprehensive understanding of the grievance process, this can result in harm being compounded rather than constructively addressed. The resulting damage to collective trust and institutional integrity presents a serious threat to our organization, one we absolutely can not afford. We can not simply trust in kind hearts and good intentions when the stakes are this high - a formalized structure is essential to ensure that Steering members understand the grievance process and are prepared to address sensitive issues appropriately.

Organizing with DSA is a responsibility we should all take seriously and approach with professionalism, particularly those of us who hold elected leadership positions. We need to be accountable to ourselves and to the body that has entrusted us with the task of political leadership. Accountability is not just about having the courage of our mistakes in their aftermath, it’s about taking steps to prevent mistakes from occurring in the first place and setting up future Steering Committees for success. For this reason, I encourage all chapter members to vote YES on this resolution to establish a robust grievance training infrastructure for chapter leadership.

IN FAVOR by Ken B

This resolution proposes some common sense requirements for steering members to undergo trainings provided by National DSA on our harassment and grievance policies as well as review our code of conduct. Our steering committee has already been in contact with the National CGO, as required by the resolution, and has already been undergoing the trainings required in this resolution. I think this is a good first step towards helping our Steering Committee build a strong HGO program that has the trust of the chapter, and I hope you’ll all join me in supporting it!

IN FAVOR by Amanda L

This resolution calls for more effective implementation of DSA’s Resolution 33, now the Unified Grievance Policy, by ensuring that chapter leaders and members understand it. I think it’s critical to vote yes for a few reasons:

  1. We need to create and sustain safe spaces for us to organize together.
  2. This requires our ongoing commitment to understanding how to implement existing policies that address harassment and conduct violations, especially as members assume positions of leadership and decision-making.
  3. Incorporating training in more areas of chapter life, including as new members, allows us to open more spaces to discuss and practice ways of identifying and resolving conflict, and repairing harm.
    Ultimately, this resolution is an important step to fostering a more inclusive and trauma-informed chapter culture. I hope you join me in voting yes!

IN FAVOR by Sam G

Hello Comrades, I recommend you VOTE YES on this Resolution which I am sponsoring. A group of eleven members collaborated to create it, and I’m grateful I was able to work alongside a member with experience professionally handling grievance & disciplinary processes in multiple organizations, a Title IX lawyer, and a mental health professional.

As our highest elected body and our highest decision-making body between General Body Meetings, the Steering Committee is empowered to review and vote on Harassment & Grievance investigations, as well as Code of Conduct violations, membership suspensions and expulsions. However, while DSA nationally has bylaws, procedures, and standards such as our Unified Grievance Policy, there currently are no expectations or requirements that Steering Committee members receive training on these rules. This is incredibly serious, given that harms such as sexual harassment, abuse & misconduct are endemic to patriarchal capitalist society, and have already taken place within our organization.

This resolution would establish the standard that anyone seeking election to our chapter’s Steering Committee must participate in national trainings on DSA’s Grievance Policy, as well as conflict resolution, offered periodically by the national Committee of Grievance Officers (CGO), in order to deliberate on disciplinary actions. If passed, anyone running for Steering would have sixty days before and sixty days after the election date to participate in these national trainings, meaning a period of approximately four months in total, with the window extended to ninety days for Steering Committee members immediately seeking reelection. If trainings are not listed on the CGO website for the sixty days following the end date of the election, the current Steering Committee members must reach out to the national CGO to schedule them for our chapter. The resolution also encourages Steering Committee members to pursue additional training in confidentiality, conflict deescalation, restorative justice, and centering the voices and experiences of survivors of harassment and abuse, which are not currently offered by the CGO.

The resolution requires Steering Committee members who have not pursued these trainings to recuse themselves from participating in such disciplinary proceedings. Additionally, it affirms the Grievance Policy’s provisions around recusal due to conflicts of interest and also applies it to our Code of Conduct process. Finally, the resolution requests that the Steering Committee reach out to the national CGO to hold these required trainings for any interested members and incorporate an appropriate version of them into New Member Cohorts, so our members would have a greater awareness of our policies.

This resolution’s requirements for Steering and efforts for new member education respectively can also help prevent secondary victimization, a term referring to the harm survivors who come forward can experience as a result of poor responses from institutions, leaders, or peers. Those who experience harassment or abuse have already had their agency violated, and a failure to abide by survivor-centered practices & maintain confidentiality can leave survivors with choosing between silence or retraumatization. Many will quietly withdraw from a community rather than knowingly risk further harm. Passing this resolution to ensure Steering Committee competence, and encourage member education, may help prevent secondary victimization, repair harm, and empower people who experience harm to come forward in the first place.

I believe that DSA is the only organization capable of becoming an alternative to the Republicans and Democrats. But we do not merely seek to replace capitalist institutions; we seek to lead a socialist transformation of society towards a just future for all. If we are serious about our task, it is imperative that our organization’s leaders are equipped to soundly and fairly make crucial decisions that affect our chapter as a whole, in line with our democratically established policies; and that our members are familiar with the policies set up to protect them.

Please join me in voting yes on this resolution!